People v. DeJesusPeople v. DeJesus
Defendant was convicted of hiring other persons to kill her husband‘s ex-wife. In carrying out the planned murder, the other persons, acting on their own accord, deliberately killed a second person who happened to be present in the intended victim‘s apartment. With respect to the latter killing, defendant did not preserve her challenge to her conviction of first-degree murder under a murder-for-hire theory (
There was overwhelming evidence supporting that count, as well as the remaining counts, and there is no merit to defendant‘s claim that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The accomplice testimony was thoroughly corroborated by a lengthy chain of additional evidence.
Defendant‘s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that defendant‘s argument that the prosecutor acted as an unsworn witness is without merit, and that any error under