We find that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in ruling upon defendant’s Sandoval motion. The probative worth of the evidence on the issue of defendant’s credibility outweighed any possible prejudicial effect (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are either without merit or unpreserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
