History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Dao
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9660
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2004
|
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), dated July 18, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was *402supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 743 [2004]; People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99 [2003]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Dao
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 12, 2004
Citation: 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9660
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.