Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered October 3, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 7 and 3V2 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied in all respects. As they followed defendant and his codefendant and kept them under surveillance, the police did nothing to limit their freedom of movement (see, People v Howard,
The identification was not unduly suggestive. The hearing record establishes that defendant was not surrounded by police until after the victim had spontaneously pointed him out without police suggestion (see, People v Ortiz,
We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.
Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.
