midpage

People v. CruzPeople v. Cruz

New York Court of Appeals
Jun 5, 1979
Versions:47 N.Y.2d 838
392 N.E.2d 565
418 N.Y.S.2d 578
1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2112

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s wife, who on direct examination had not testified as a character witness, was cross-examined regarding defendant’s prior criminal record. While this was concededly error, such questioning did not rise to the level of constitutional error depriving defendant of a fair trial. In such circumstances, and in view of the court’s efforts to give curative instructions, the overwhelming evidence against defendant, and the lack of significant probability of acquittal absent such testimony, this cross-examination constituted harmless error (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Cruz
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 5, 1979
Citations: 47 N.Y.2d 838; 392 N.E.2d 565; 418 N.Y.S.2d 578; 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2112
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In