People v. Crum

Feb 1, 2011
Versions:81 A.D.3d 619
915 N.Y.S.2d 876

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the Supreme Court‘s designation of him as a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see generally Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 408 [2010]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.