History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Coutant
143 A.D.3d 1015
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: October 6, 2016 107579 ________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC COUTANT,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 15, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rose and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Theodore J. Stein, Woodstock, for appellant.

D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Aarons, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered March 24, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and the plea agreement included the waiver of the right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant, as a prior felony offender, to five years in prison, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant's contention, his waiver of the right to appeal was valid. County Court explained that

-2- 107579 the right to appeal is separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by a guilty plea and confirmed that defendant understood the ramifications of the waiver. Defendant thereafter executed a counseled written waiver in open court. Under these circumstances, we conclude that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Mydosh, 117 AD3d 1195, 1195-1196 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 963 [2014]; People v Koumjian, 101 AD3d 1175, 1175 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1100 [2013]). Therefore, defendant's contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive is precluded from our review (see People v Miller, 137 AD3d 1485, 1485 [2016]; People v Crispell, 136 AD3d 1121, 1122 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1149 [2016]).

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch and Rose, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Coutant
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 6, 2016
Citation: 143 A.D.3d 1015
Docket Number: 107579
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.