People v. CossPeople v. Coss
Defendant‘s challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution is unpreserved for our review given his failure to move for withdrawal of the plea or vacatur of the judgment of conviction (see People v Nugent, 31 AD3d 976, 977 [2006]; People v Feller, 25 AD3d 881, 881 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 812 [2006]). In any event, it was not imperative for County Court to inquire as to the underlying facts as “[a] bargained guilty plea to a
Additionally, we find no merit to defendant‘s claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive. In view of the brutal nature of the crime committed as well as defendant‘s extensive criminal history, we discern neither an abuse of discretion on the part of County Court nor the existence of any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the lawful, agreed-upon sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Weiskopff, 20 AD3d 776, 776 [2005]).
Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.