History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Coleman
982 N.Y.S.2d 784
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2014
|
Check Treatment

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed February 8, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Dillon, Balkin, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Coleman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 2, 2014
Citation: 982 N.Y.S.2d 784
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.