History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Coffey
13 N.Y.2d 726
NY
1963
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of -the United States as follows: Appellant contended that (1) the failure to require disclosure of the name of the informant under the circumstances disclosed in the record and (2) the joint and several acts of the Federal and State police officers constituted an illegal search in violation of the Fourth Amendment and deprived him of due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated. [See 12 N Y 2d 443.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Coffey
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 29, 1963
Citation: 13 N.Y.2d 726
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.