History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Cochran
2 Johns. Cas. 73
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1800
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

No circumstances attending the offence on either side being shown, the court have no criterion by which to regulate their discretion in fixing the punishment. We are therefore bound to consider it as a common offence; and, accordingly, impose a fine, of one dollar.

*Lansing, Ch. J. dissented. He was of opinion that a higher fine ought to be imposed.(a)

(a) When the prisoner pleads guilty, and the court have no means of determining the extent of the offence charged, the practice is for the court to receive such affidavits as may be offered in aggravation or extenuation thereof. People v. Watts, MSS. April term, 1843, N. Y. Gen. Sessions; People v. Childs, MSS. June term, 1844, same court.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Cochran
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1800
Citation: 2 Johns. Cas. 73
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.