midpage

People v. ClancyPeople v. Clancy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 19, 2005
Versions:24 A.D.3d 686
805 N.Y.S.2d 523

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant‘s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]; People v Headley, 289 AD2d 341 [2001]). Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Clancy
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 19, 2005
Citations: 24 A.D.3d 686; 805 N.Y.S.2d 523
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In