People v. CherryPeople v. Cherry
Versions:60 A.D.3d 484873 N.Y.S.2d 909
The record supports the court‘s discretionary upward departure to a level three sex offender adjudication. There was clear and convincing evidence of factors, not adequately accounted for in the risk assessment instrument, demonstrating that defendant has a high risk of reoffending (see e.g. People v O‘Flaherty, 23 AD3d 237 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 705 [2006]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.