People v. CheeseboroPeople v. Cheeseboro
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the trial court’s charge with respect to the justification defense was improper because it did not include specific language on excessive force is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object to the charge on this ground, and failed to request supplemental instructions (see
The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit.
Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and McCarthy, JJ., concur.