People v. CedenoPeople v. Cedeno
- Reporters:
- , , ,
OPINION
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s only contention in our court is that the lapse of 13 months between his arrest and his arraignment on the indictment was an unreasonable delay in prosecution which constituted a denial of his constitutional right to due process in consequence of which his conviction should be reversed and the indictment dismissed
(People v Singer,
44 NY2d 241;
People v Staley,
41 NY2d 789). While defendant did make a motion to dismiss the indictment under
Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Chief Judge Cooke taking no part.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.