midpage

People v. CedenoPeople v. Cedeno

New York Court of Appeals
Jan 8, 1981
Versions:52 N.Y.2d 847
418 N.E.2d 665
437 N.Y.S.2d 72
1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2175

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s only contention in our court is that the lapse of 13 months between his arrest and his arraignment on the indictment was an unreasonable delay in prosecution which constituted a denial of his constitutional right to due process in consequence of which his conviction should be reversed and the indictment dismissed (People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241; People v Staley, 41 NY2d 789). While defendant did make a motion to dismiss the indictment under CPL 30.30, he made no motion to dismiss based on the contention he now advances. In that circumstance he has failed to preserve that contention for our review (People v Lieberman, 47 NY2d 931).

Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Chief Judge Cooke taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Cedeno
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 8, 1981
Citations: 52 N.Y.2d 847; 418 N.E.2d 665; 437 N.Y.S.2d 72; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2175
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In