People v. CastilloPeople v. Castillo
Defendant‘s claims that a detective‘s testimony concerning her investigation constituted improper bolstering and that the court improperly determined that a child was competent to be sworn as a witness are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.