History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Cartagena
212 A.D.2d 802
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1995
|
Check Treatment

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered May 14, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was denied due process of law because he was not present at a portion of the Sandoval hearing conducted at a sidebar conference. The defendant was present at the hearing during which the court heard arguments and rendered a final ruling on the motion. Moreover, the sidebar conference was held after the arguments and ruling were made. Since the defendant has failed to demonstrate that he was in any way prejudiced by his alleged absence from the sidebar conference or that his ability to defend himself was in any way compromised, we find *803that his presence at the sidebar hearing would have been superfluous (see, People v Ray, 184 AD2d 596).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Cartagena
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 27, 1995
Citation: 212 A.D.2d 802
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.