History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Cardone
68 N.Y.2d 829
NY
1986
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of County Court should be affirmed.

We agree that the Trial Judge did not err in refusing to charge the defense of justification pursuant to Penal Law § 35.05 (1). That statute provides in part that conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal when "[s]uch conduct is required or authorized by law or by a judicial decree”. Defendant’s belief that his conduct was authorized does not warrant submission of a justification charge to the jury (compare, Model Penal Code §3.03 [3] [a]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Cardone
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 7, 1986
Citation: 68 N.Y.2d 829
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.