History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Carafas
11 N.Y.2d 969
NY
1962
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellants contended that they were convicted on evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure in violation of their rights under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and that such unlawful search and seizure deprived them of their constitutional right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that appellants’ constitutional rights were not violated. [See 11 N Y 2d 891.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Carafas
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 10, 1962
Citation: 11 N.Y.2d 969
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.