People v. CaraballoPeople v. Caraballo
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Thе defendаnt‘s purported waiver of his right to аppеal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preсlude review of his exсessive sentencе claim. However, contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Dillon, Leventhal, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.