midpage

People v. CandelarioPeople v. Candelario

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 3, 2003
Versions:307 A.D.2d 771
762 N.Y.S.2d 856
2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7935

Appeal from a judgment of Ontario County Court (Harvey, J.), entered November 24, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Defendant received “an advantageous plea and nothing in the record casts doubt *772on the apparent effectiveness of counsel,” and thus we conclude that he received meaningful representation (People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). The bargained-for sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Green, J.P., Wisner, Burns, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Candelario
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 3, 2003
Citations: 307 A.D.2d 771; 762 N.Y.S.2d 856; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7935
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In