midpage

People v. CancelPeople v. Cancel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 21, 2012
Versions:92 A.D.3d 891
938 N.Y.2d 814

The defendant‘s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Shaffer, 81 AD3d 989 [2011]; People v Budden, 77 AD3d 672 [2010]). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant‘s plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]).

The defendant‘s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based on matter dehors the record, and therefore cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Brewer, 73 AD3d 1199 [2010]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Cancel
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 21, 2012
Citations: 92 A.D.3d 891; 938 N.Y.2d 814
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In