THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v LANCE CAIN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
March 3, 2005
792 NYS2d 60 | 16 A.D.3d 288
The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting testimony from the surviving victim and from an expert witness concerning defendant’s membership in the Bloods gang, as well as the customs, hierarchies and violent practices of the Bloods. This evidence was highly probative of defendant’s motive, as well as his accessorial liability for the acts of the person who
Although evidence of the surviving victim’s lineup identification of the separately tried second perpetrator was irrelevant (see People v Jenkins, 305 AD2d 287 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 621 [2003]), the court provided extensive limiting instructions that prevented any prejudice.
The prosecutor’s brief and isolated summation reference to testimony that had been stricken from the record does not warrant reversal (see People v D’Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Concur —Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.
