History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Caggiano
129 A.D.2d 992
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1987
|
Check Treatment

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Having interposed a defense of insanity, defendant argues on appeal that the People have failed to prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree. While there was conflicting opinion testimony, the weight to be accorded to expert testimony is a matter for the jury (Corpino v Baker, 66 AD2d 201, 204). A review of the record clearly supports the conclusion that the evidence was legally sufficient to support the verdict.

We have reviewed the other points raised by defendant on the appeals and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Forma, J.—burglary, first degree, and other offenses.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Caggiano
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 3, 1987
Citation: 129 A.D.2d 992
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.