History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Burns
304 N.Y. 380
NY
1952
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In the record before us requisite proof is lacking that participants in the game upon which the indictment is based were “ persons who have paid * * * consideration for the chance ” so as to constitute a lottery within the meaning of section 1370 of the Penal Law (People v. Shafer, 273 N. Y. 475).

The judgments should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

Lohghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Ftjld and Froessel, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Burns
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 15, 1952
Citation: 304 N.Y. 380
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.