History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Burgett
15 A.D.2d 873
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1962
|
Check Treatment
Memorandum:

The County Judge who passed upon appellant’s application was disqualified by reason of the fact that he was District Attorney of Ontario County at the time of appellant’s conviction. (Judiciary Law, § 14; People v. Morgan, 277 App. Div. 956; People v. Wurzler, 300 N. Y. 344.) In view of this disqualification he could not decide whether or not the matter was res judicata and lacked capacity to make the order appealed from. (Cf. Oakley v. Aspinwall, 3 N. Y. 547.) We do not pass upon the *874issue of res judicata. It appears that appellant has never had the benefit of a review by an appellate court of the question tendered. Whether or not the doctrine of res judicata should be strictly applied by a court of original jurisdiction in a post-conviction proceeding is a question to be determined upon consideration of this application anew before another Judge. Cf. People ex rel. Baumgart v. Martin, 9 N Y 2d 351). (Appeal from order of Ontario County Court denying a motion to set aside a 1943 indictment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Burgett
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 22, 1962
Citation: 15 A.D.2d 873
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.