People v. Buonincontri, 6 N.Y.3d 726

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The defendant was informed on the record that she had the right to be present during questioning of a prospective juror concerning the ability to be fair and impartial. The Appellate Division properly determined that defendant failed to present an adequate record to overcome the presumption of regularity (see People v Velasquez, 1 NY3d 44, 48 [2003]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Buonincontri

Court Name: New York Court of Appeals

Date Published: Dec 15, 2005

Citations: 6 N.Y.3d 726; 843 N.E.2d 1143; 810 N.Y.S.2d 403; 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3346

Court Abbreviation: N.Y.