History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Buckley
49 Cal. 241
Cal.
1874
Check Treatment
By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The verdict is good. When the jury ' ‘ agree ” they ‘' find ” if they return their agreement into Court. The verdict would have been sufficient if it had been simply “Guilty of murder in the second degree.”

The defendant challenged a juror thus: “I challenge the juror for implied bias.” This was not a proper specification of the grounds of challenge. (People v. Reynolds, 16 Cal. 130; People v. Renfrow 41 Cal. 37.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Buckley
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1874
Citation: 49 Cal. 241
Docket Number: No. 10,096
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.