People v. BrownPeople v. Brown
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting defendant, following a jury trial, of arson in the second degree (Penal Law § 150.15), criminal mischief in the second degree (Penal Law § 145.10) and two counts of criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law § 145.05), defendant contends that the evidence at trial, which was wholly circum
A court reviewing the legal sufficiency of the trial evidence must determine "whether any valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the fact finder on the basis of the evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the People” (People v Williams,
Defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for our review {see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice {see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Purple, Jr., J.—Arson, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.