People v. BrownPeople v. Brown
We affirm. In light of defendant‘s brief but extensive criminal history, his inability to comply with supervision and the victim impact statements, we are not persuaded to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice and reduce his sentence (see People v Sanchez, 87 AD3d 1226, 1227 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 928 [2012]).
Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.