THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v CURTIS BROWN, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
January 10, 2007
874 N.Y.S.2d 917
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial by comments made by the prosecutor during his cross-examination and the prosecutor’s summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see
The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Tonge, 93 NY2d 838 [1999]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998]).
Rivera, J.P., Florio, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.
