midpage

People v. BrownPeople v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 13, 2008
Versions:48 A.D.3d 590
849 N.Y.S.2d 901

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant‘s contentions regarding the prosecutor‘s summation are unpreserved for appellate review. The defendant failed to object or raised only general objections to the challenged comments, did not request curative instructions when one objection was sustained, and failed to move for a mistrial (see People v Salnave, 41 AD3d 872 [2007]; People v White, 5 AD3d 511 [2004]). In any event, the challenged comments were all either fair comment on the evidence, responsive to arguments and theories presented in the defense summation, or harmless (see People v Montero, 44 AD3d 796 [2007]).

The defendant‘s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Brown
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 13, 2008
Citations: 48 A.D.3d 590; 849 N.Y.S.2d 901
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In