People v. BrownPeople v. Brown
- Reporters:
- ,
Initially, given that defendant is on parole, we do not agree with the People‘s contention that defendant‘s appeal is moot due to his October 12, 2006 release from prison (see People v Hastings, 24 AD3d 954, 956 n [2005]). Nevertheless, we find no merit to defendant‘s claim that the term of imprisonment imposed upon resentencing is harsh and excessive in view of his history of drug and alcohol-related offenses, his acknowledgment that the maximum sentence could be imposed for a probation violation and his admission to such violation. In sum, there are no extraordinary circumstances that exist which warrant a reduction of the sentence (see People v Murphy, 257 AD2d 766, 767 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 876 [1999]).
Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.