midpage

People v. BronstonPeople v. Bronston

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 16, 1986
Versions:68 N.Y.2d 880
501 N.E.2d 579
508 N.Y.S.2d 930
1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20599

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As found by the majority at the Appellate Division, Officer Sheffler, in responding at 4:30 a.m. to a 911 report of a burglary in progress at 155th Street and 8th Avenue, in Manhattan, ordered defendant down from a fire escape at gunpoint, put him against the wall, and frisked him without first inquiring about his reasons for being there. The majority properly held that this conduct was unjustified. We agree with the dissent, however, that the nature and location of the area where a suspect is detained may be one of the factors considered in determining whether, in a given case, the police acted reasonably (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 220; People v Oden, 36 NY2d 382, 385). Nevertheless, this factor, if considered here together with the circumstance that defendant’s clothing and his presence on the fire escape were consistent with information transmitted in the report, would not warrant the degree of intrusion employed.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Bronston
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 16, 1986
Citations: 68 N.Y.2d 880; 501 N.E.2d 579; 508 N.Y.S.2d 930; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20599
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In