THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v IESA BRITT, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
2009
886 N.Y.S.2d 622
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the hearing court properly assessed points for risk factor 7 because he was a stranger to the victim (see People v Lewis, 45 AD3d 1381 [2007]; People v Penson, 38 AD3d 866, 867 [2007]; Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 12 [2006] [hereinafter Guidelines]). Furthermore, the court properly assessed points for risk factor 11, given the defendant‘s
The defendant‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
