People v. BrickhousePeople v. Brickhouse
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Garry, Egan Jr., Devine, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald
We affirm. Defendant‘s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence is harsh and excessive, but that claim is precluded by his unchallenged appeal waiver (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; People v Kusmirek, 171 AD3d 1311, 1311 [2019]; People v Rickenbacker, 168 AD3d 1315, 1315 [2019], lv denied 33 NY3d 953 [2019]). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Devine, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.