People v. BradshawPeople v. Bradshaw
Versions:105 A.D.3d 758961 N.Y.S.2d 797
The defendant‘s contention that the sentencing court failed to conduct a proper inquiry into his post-plea arrest before imposing an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Miles, 268 AD2d 489 [2000]). In any event, the sentencing court‘s inquiry was proper (see generally People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 713 [1993]).
To the extent that the defendant contends that his sentence was excessive, that contention is precluded by the defendant‘s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]). Dillon, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.