midpage

People v. BornhoeftPeople v. Bornhoeft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 29, 2008
Versions:53 A.D.3d 666
860 N.Y.S.2d 918

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]; CPL 470.15 [5]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury‘s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Fisher, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Carni, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Bornhoeft
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 29, 2008
Citations: 53 A.D.3d 666; 860 N.Y.S.2d 918
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In