midpage

People v. BorgPeople v. Borg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 22, 1985
Versions:110 A.D.2d 844
488 N.Y.S.2d 623
1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48748

The hearing court properly determined that defendant and his wife had voluntarily consented to the searches (see, People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122) and that defendant’s statement to Investigator McKnight after defendant had invoked his right to counsel was admissible as a spontaneous statement (see, People v Rogers, 48 NY2d 167). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Borg
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 22, 1985
Citations: 110 A.D.2d 844; 488 N.Y.S.2d 623; 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48748
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In