History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Bonino
265 A.D. 960
N.Y. App. Div.
1942
Check Treatment

No opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs, with the following memorandum: Refusal to charge as requested at folio 2231 was error. However, the significance of the error was overshadowed by emphatic statements in the charge of the law in respect of the same subject-matter.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Bonino
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 22, 1942
Citation: 265 A.D. 960
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.