midpage

People v. BoneyPeople v. Boney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 29, 2015
Versions:130 A.D.3d 1057
13 N.Y.S.3d 842

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant‘s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 144-145 [2014]; People v Jones, 118 AD3d 1026, 1027 [2014]) and those contentions raised in his pro se supplemental brief (see People v Huggins, 105 AD3d 760, 761 [2013]; People v Devodier, 102 AD3d 884, 884 [2013]; see generally People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]).

Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Boney
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 29, 2015
Citations: 130 A.D.3d 1057; 13 N.Y.S.3d 842
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In