People v. BoneyPeople v. Boney
Versions:130 A.D.3d 105713 N.Y.S.3d 842
The defendant‘s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 144-145 [2014]; People v Jones, 118 AD3d 1026, 1027 [2014]) and those contentions raised in his pro se supplemental brief (see People v Huggins, 105 AD3d 760, 761 [2013]; People v Devodier, 102 AD3d 884, 884 [2013]; see generally People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]).
Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.