History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Blumenthal
235 A.D. 542
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This record presents serious errors in the receipt of evidence of appellant’s failure to deny the accusations of the defendant Blumenthal made in his presence while under arrest. (See People v. Smith, 172 N. Y. 210, 234; People v. Marendi, 213 id. 600, 613; People v. Infantino, 224 App. Div. 193, 197; People v. Sanacory, 234 id. 628.) The competent evidence in the record, however, clearly establishes defendant’s guilt. Defendant confessed to a substantial participation in the crime. While this confession is not as broad as the admissions improperly received in evidence, it is sufficient to establish the essential elements of the crime charged as defined in the Penal Law, section 1250, subdivision 1 (as amd. by Laws of 1911, chap. 625). We are of the opinion, in view of the clearly-established guilt of the defendant, that the errors complained of must be disregarded under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the judgment of conviction affirmed.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Blumenthal
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 10, 1932
Citation: 235 A.D. 542
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.