Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered September 4, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The undercover officers’ radioed descriptions were sufficiently specific, when taken together with the relevant temporal and spatial factors, to establish reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant for a confirmatory showup (see People v Haulsey,
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley,
Defendant expressly waived his claim that the court should have discharged an allegedly unfit deliberating juror and declared a mistrial (see People v Lee,
We decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to dismiss the noninclusory concurrent count (see People v Spence,
