History
  • No items yet
midpage
764 N.W.2d 281
Mich.
2009

Lead Opinion

Court of Appeals No. 245099.






Concurrence Opinion

Markman, J.

(concurring). For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in People v Blackston, 481 Mich 451 (2008), I continue to believe that the trial court abused its discretion here in excluding the recanting statements and that the error was not harmless. However, because this Court has already addressed this issue and my position did not prevail, and because I agree with the Court of Appeals that defendant’s remaining issues are without merit, I concur in this Court’s decision to now deny leave to appeal.

Kelly, C. J. I join the statement of Justice Markman.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Blackston
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: May 1, 2009
Citations: 764 N.W.2d 281; 483 Mich. 986; 137627
Docket Number: 137627
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In