History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Billick
193 A.D. 914
N.Y. App. Div.
1920
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

We think the trial court committed error in refusing to charge the jury, at the request .of the defendant, that evidence of good character may, of itself, create a reasonable doubt when without it none would exist; in refusing to charge the jury might in the exercise of sound judgment give the defendant the benefit of good character no matter how conclusive the other testimony might appear to be; in refusing to charge the jury that the district attorney had the right to produce witnesses to show the bad character of the defendant after witnesses to his good character had given them testimony; that the errors so committed were prejudicial and require a reversal. All concur. Judgment of conviction reversed and a new trial granted.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Billick
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 15, 1920
Citation: 193 A.D. 914
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.