People v. Bigus, 68 N.Y.2d 723

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‍pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‍(22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum of ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‍the Appellate Division (115 AD2d 751). Unlike People v Briggins (50 NY2d 302), there ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‍was here a fraudulent intent.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‍Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Bigus

Court Name: New York Court of Appeals

Date Published: Jul 8, 1986

Citations: 68 N.Y.2d 723; 497 N.E.2d 700; 506 N.Y.S.2d 333; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19491

Court Abbreviation: N.Y.