History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Bigus
68 N.Y.2d 723
NY
1986
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (115 AD2d 751). Unlike People v Briggins (50 NY2d 302), there was here a fraudulent intent.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Bigus
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 8, 1986
Citation: 68 N.Y.2d 723
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.