People v. BicetPeople v. Bicet
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered September 4, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes,
The defendant asserts that his conviction must be reversed because the two interpreters who translated the complainant’s testimony from Spanish to English were not sworn to interpret properly. We disagree. Although an interpreter must be sworn to interpret properly and accurately (see, e.g., People v Fisher,
Lastly, we find that the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Alicea,