People v. BetheaPeople v. Bethea
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant‘s request to charge attempted petit larceny as a lesser-included offense of robbery in the second degree. There was a reasonable view of the evidence that would have supported a finding that the defendant committed the lesser offense but did not commit the greater (see
In light of our determination, the defendant‘s remaining
Ritter, J.P., Rivera, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.