History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Berrier
637 N.Y.S.2d 69
N.Y. App. Div.
1996
Check Treatment

Judgment, Supreme *457Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered January 7, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 2V2 to 5 years and 1 year, and an unconditional discharge, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court correctly charged that in order to convict defendant of possessing a gravity knife, the prosecution had to prove that defendant knew he had a knife in his possession, not that he knew it was specifically a gravity knife, and that the knife fit the legal description of a gravity knife under Penal Law § 265.00 (5). Knowledge that the thing possessed answers the description of one of the prohibited instruments is not an element of third-degree criminal possession of a weapon (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]; People v Visarities, 220 App Div 657, 658, citing People v Persce, 204 NY 397; see also, People v Ansare, 96 AD2d 96, 97). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Berrier
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 23, 1996
Citation: 637 N.Y.S.2d 69
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In