People v. BenedictPeople v. Benedict
—Appeal from
The record indicates that a three-count indictment was returned by a Grand Jury in May 1993 charging defendant with driving while intoxicated, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and speeding. Defendant failed to appear at the scheduled arraignment and a warrant for his arrest was issued. Thereafter, defendant, who had absconded to Canada, voluntarily contacted the District Attorney’s office and arranged his surrender. Pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, defendant ultimately pleaded guilty to a single count of driving while intoxicated in satisfaction of the indictment and in exchange for a commitment from the People not to pursue a charge of bail jumping. Defendant was sentenced to five years’ probation, 45 days in jail and a $2,500 fine. His sole argument on appeal is that this sentence was harsh and excessive, a contention we cannot endorse.
A sentence within permissible statutory ranges will not be disturbed unless the sentencing court abused its discretion or extraordinary circumstances exist warranting a modification (see, People v Dolphy,
Crew III, J. P., Carpinello, Graffeo, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.